Bakari Kitwana recently wrote an article that conected commen misconcpetions surrounding hip-hop with the Imus incident:
When Don Imus put his foot in his mouth on the air last week with a dirty and derogatory reference to young black women, he was articulating a message that had been clearly voiced by Michael Richards, Rush Limbaugh and countless others long before him. Ditto the white law students at the University of Connecticut who donned big booties and blackface this year on Martin Luther King Day, as well as the rash of undergraduates across the country, from Michigan to South Carolina, who somehow imagine that hosting “pimp and ho parties”is a good idea.
That message is this: The aesthetics of hip-hop culture - from the language and clothing to the style and sensibility - can be absorbed into American popular culture like any other disposable product without any effort or responsibility on the part of the consumer.
It is an idea in part ushered in by the marginal voices of black youth themselves, youth so eager to be visible that they gave up far too much of their identity in the interest of partnering with the corporate music industry. Together, and all the while green-lighted by the Federal Communications Commission, a handful of rap artists packaged and commodified rap music (not to be confused with hip-hop culture lived daily by countless youth around the globe at a local level, from graffiti and break dancing to deejaying, spoken word poetry and political activism.).
Encouraged by the quick bucks, this partnership was quickly reinforced by additional peddlers of one-dimensional images of young black men as violent, and women as oversexed bitches and hos - from filmmakers and television producers to music video directors, comedians and beyond.
Read entire article by Bakari Kitwana.
The overly sexy and violent nature of mainstream rap and “hip-hop” comes from mainstream American culture, not hip-hop culture. Hollywood, record producers and TV conglomerates peddle sex and violence, because it sells. They took only parts of hip-hop that they can package and sell. That’s why rapping became the most prominent part of hip-hop in the mainstream: because CDs sell much easier than break dancers and graffiti artists.
Blaming hip-hop for mainstream hip-hop artists is as silly as blaming singing for Brittany Spears. If you turn on the TV, you’re more likely to see Brittany Spears than Andrea Bocelli. You’re more likely to see overly violent, overly sexy and overly vulgar rap than cultured hip-hop.
Like all pop music, mainstream rap is the manifestation of mainstream American capitalism and commercialism directed towards an oversexed and violence-obsessed consumer-base.
What do you think?